Oshkosh CorporationArticle notes Oshkosh's lower valuation and defensive government contract reliance, but revenue declined and margin is lower; no clear positive or negative catalyst.
Caterpillar and Oshkosh offer distinct investment profiles for 2026, with Caterpillar favored for its AI-driven growth potential despite a higher valuation. Caterpillar reported fiscal 2025 revenue of nearly $67.6 billion, a 4.3% increase, and net income of approximately $8.9 billion, though its net margin fell to 13.1% from 16.7% in fiscal 2024. Oshkosh posted fiscal 2025 revenue of about $10.4 billion, down nearly 2.9%, with net income of roughly $647 million and a net margin of 6.2%. Oshkosh trades at a forward P/E of 13.1x and a price-to-sales ratio of 0.9x, significantly cheaper than Caterpillar's 38.8x forward P/E and 6.5x price-to-sales ratio. The analysis concludes that Caterpillar is the better choice for investors willing to pay a premium for exposure to AI-related infrastructure spending, while Oshkosh is a more conservative, defensive play reliant on government contracts.
Oshkosh CorporationArticle notes Oshkosh's lower valuation and defensive government contract reliance, but revenue declined and margin is lower; no clear positive or negative catalyst.
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Caterpillar IncArticle highlights Caterpillar's revenue growth and AI-driven infrastructure spending potential, making it a better buy despite higher valuation.
Carter’s Inc
Deere & Company
PACCAR Inc