Circle Partners with South Korea's Kakao to Jointly Explore USDC-Based Payment Infrastructure

Corporate ActionDigital Finance
โดย NADA NEWS·Read original
Summary · why it matters

Stablecoin issuer Circle announced on July 23 that it has signed a memorandum of understanding with South Korean IT giant Kakao Group to collaborate on blockchain-based payment infrastructure and digital asset technology. The two companies will jointly explore the potential use of USD Coin and Circle's global payment network in the South Korean market, evaluating business opportunities such as payments using USDC, clearing and settlement, and connectivity with digital asset services. Kakao Group includes Kakao, which operates the messaging app KakaoTalk, as well as Kakao Pay and KakaoBank, and the partnership will examine possibilities for combining each company's digital platforms and financial services with Circle's blockchain technology. On the same day, Circle also announced similar MOUs with Viva Republica, which operates Toss, and Toss Bank, to explore cooperation on blockchain payment infrastructure and stablecoin technology.

Impact on stocks 4

Digital Finance & Tokenization · 4 stocks
Circle Internet Group, Inc.
CRCL
▲ PositiveDemandrelevance

Circle signs MOU with Kakao to explore USDC-based payment infrastructure in South Korea, expanding potential use of its stablecoin.

Kakao Corp
035720
▲ PositiveTechnologyrelevance

Kakao Group partners with Circle to explore blockchain payment infrastructure and digital asset technology.

KakaoBank Corp
323410
▲ PositiveTechnologyrelevance

KakaoBank is part of Kakao Group's MOU with Circle to explore stablecoin-based payment and settlement opportunities.

kakaopay Corp.
377300
▲ PositiveTechnologyrelevance

Kakao Pay is included in Kakao Group's MOU with Circle to explore USDC payment integration.

Theme Impact 2

Off-coverage companies 2

Viva RepublicaPrivate▲ Positive
Demandrelevance

Circle's MOU with Viva Republica (Toss) to explore USDC-based payment infrastructure could drive adoption of Circle's stablecoin and payment network in South Korea.

Toss BankPrivate▲ Positive
Technologyrelevance

Toss Bank signs separate MOU with Circle to explore blockchain payment infrastructure and stablecoin technology.

Related news

2impact 4

S&P Global Acquires OpenZeppelin to Rate Smart Contract Risk

S&P Global announced on September 17, 2026 that it has acquired OpenZeppelin, the industry standard for smart contract security, in a move that extends the ratings firm's risk-assessment mandate into the technology-risk layer of digital assets. OpenZeppelin's libraries underpin over $37 trillion in cumulative transfers and power 8 of the top 10 stablecoins, including USDC, and 10 of the top 10 tokenized money market funds, such as BlackRock's BUIDL and Franklin Templeton's BENJI. OpenZeppelin will operate as a separate business unit led by CEO Demian Brener, who will report directly to Yann Le Pallec, President of S&P Global Ratings. The deal lands on the same day the SEC granted a 5-year exemption for tokenized NMS stock trading, aligning with the broader GENIUS Act framework, and ahead of the DTCC Tokenization Service launch in October 2026. S&P Global is positioning itself as the gatekeeper of the technical standards regulators are expected to require for tokenized markets.
Yahoo Finance·4hRead more →
impact 4

Europe Runs Live Agent Payments Across 30+ Banks as US Stalls on Liability

Europe has moved agentic payments into live production while the United States remains stalled over who bears the loss when an AI agent errs. Live end-to-end payments have been executed by Santander, Mastercard, ING, and Worldline, and on July 2, 2026, ING, Worldline, and Visa completed an agentic payment in Germany using Visa Payment Passkeys for biometric authentication. Mastercard has enabled all issuers in Europe at the network level for Agent Pay, backed by a new Lisbon Centre of Excellence for Innovation, with Mastercard Europe President Kelly Devine calling agentic payments a profound shift in how commerce is initiated and executed. In the US, the Treasury OIG has flagged ambiguity in Regulation E on agent authorization, and the AI AGENT Act introduced in July 2026 addresses fiduciary duties rather than liability allocation for agent misexecution, prompting the Consumer Bankers Association to recommend the industry write its own private network rules. Hypertrade data shows a 4,700% year-over-year increase in AI-generated traffic to retail sites, yet agentic commerce is less than 1% of US e-commerce, with only 23% of US consumers trusting generative AI to handle payment transactions and 93% of merchants saying the AI provider should bear the financial loss for incorrect purchases.
Yahoo Finance·9hRead more →
2

Mastercard, Visa race to set standards for AI agent shopping payments

Mastercard rolled out a payment option Thursday that lets cardholders give an AI agent a virtual card to buy things online without checking in before each purchase, with limits on spending, retailers, or required approval before checkout. Rival Visa partnered with Alchemy earlier this year and has announced its own AI shopping and payment product, Visa Intelligent Commerce, which the company says is still being deployed, while Meta's Muse can search for products and navigate checkout but presents the purchase for the user's final approval. Phil Bruno, chief strategy and growth officer at payments company ACI Worldwide, called it "a land grab for infrastructure standards," saying that if card companies set the standards for agentic commerce they can keep the commerce in their environments for decades to come. Consumer appetite lags the infrastructure push: just 7% of U.S. and U.K. consumers surveyed who buy fashion items said they would allow an AI assistant to make purchases without approval under predefined conditions, according to research commissioned by ACI Worldwide, and more than half said they were uncomfortable allowing AI to purchase on their behalf. Mastercard has developed a digital paper trail called Verifiable Intent to record who authorized the agent to shop and what it was authorized to buy, but when asked who would be responsible if an agent made an incorrect, fraudulent, or unauthorized purchase, Mastercard pointed back to Verifiable Intent and did not specify who would ultimately be responsible if an agent bought something outside those instructions.
Fortune·10hRead more →