Kinross Gold CorporationKinross has lower valuation (P/E 8.27 vs 9.24) and higher EPS growth (58.2% vs 43.8%), making it a more favorable pick.
Kinross Gold appears a more favorable pick than Newmont for gold-sector investors, based on its lower valuation and higher growth estimates, even as both miners hold a Zacks Rank #3. Gold prices have tumbled from a record near $5,600 per ounce in January to around $4,000 recently, pressured by rate-hike expectations and a stronger dollar. Newmont’s 2026 production is forecast to decline to about 5.26 million ounces, partly due to site transitions and divestments, while Kinross is advancing three U.S. growth projects expected to add 3 million ounces of life-of-mine production. Kinross trades at a forward earnings multiple of 8.27, below Newmont’s 9.24 and the industry average, and its 2026 earnings per share are projected to rise 58.2 percent, outpacing Newmont’s 43.8 percent growth. Both companies maintain strong liquidity and shareholder-return programs, but Kinross’s cost pressures are reflected in an expected all-in sustaining cost of $1,730 per ounce for 2026.
Kinross Gold CorporationKinross has lower valuation (P/E 8.27 vs 9.24) and higher EPS growth (58.2% vs 43.8%), making it a more favorable pick.
Newmont Goldcorp CorpNewmont has higher valuation, lower production forecast (5.26M oz in 2026), and lower EPS growth (43.8%) compared to Kinross.