Meta Superintelligence Labs Ships Muse Code Agent with Aggressive Contributor Tier Pricing

Product / Tech
โดย Yahoo Finance·US·Read original
Summary · why it matters

Meta Superintelligence Labs shipped its first commercial product, Muse Code, a terminal-based coding agent powered by the Muse Spark 1.2 model, on August 5, 2026. The unit was formed after Meta's roughly $14.3 billion acquihire of Scale AI and is led by Alexandr Wang. Standard pricing is $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output, but a contributor tier offers approximately $0.10 per million input and $0.20 per million output in exchange for allowing Meta to use prompts and completions to improve its models. On vendor-reported benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.2 scores 82.9% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 59.3% on DeepSWE 1.1, trailing only Claude Opus 5 at 86.7%. The launch mirrors Google DeepMind's structure by splitting research from product and imposing a revenue mandate, with the contributor tier designed to create a data flywheel that subsidizes access while generating training data to close the performance gap with top-tier models.

Impact on stocks 2

Artificial Intelligence · 2 stocks
Meta Platforms Inc.
META
▲ PositiveTechnologyrelevance

Meta ships its first commercial coding agent, Muse Code, with competitive benchmarks.

Theme Impact 1

Off-coverage companies 2

Scale AI, Inc.Private▲ Positive
Capitalrelevance

Scale AI acquihire forms the unit, but no direct impact on private company.

DeepMindPrivate± Mixed
relevance

Related news

UBS Flags AI Science Shift as Investment Theme After OpenAI Proof

UBS Wealth Management says artificial intelligence is moving beyond text generation into scientific research, opening investment opportunities across AI infrastructure, pharmaceuticals, nuclear fusion, industrial materials and utilities. The shift was highlighted by OpenAI's recent mathematical proof related to the Navier-Stokes equations, a centuries-old fluid dynamics problem and one of seven Millennium Prize Problems, which OpenAI tackled using 10,000 autonomous AI agents working in parallel for 88 hours before formalizing the proof with Lean, a system for machine-checked mathematical validation. In pharmaceuticals, multi-agent AI systems can simulate millions of protein variations in the cloud, and more than 170 AI-designed programs are already in development or clinical evaluation, including Phase III trials. In nuclear fusion, reinforcement-learning systems can predict plasma disruptions around 200 milliseconds before they occur and adjust magnetic coils thousands of times per second, while AI models in materials science can test millions of elemental combinations daily in search of properties for lighter, higher-density batteries, lower-heat computing hardware and potential room-temperature superconductors. The broader investment case centers on AI becoming a tool for automating scientific research rather than simply generating content, with companies exposed to AI infrastructure, pharmaceuticals, industrial materials and utilities positioned to benefit as these technologies move toward commercial applications.
Investing.com·4hRead more →
impact 4

Europe Runs Live Agent Payments Across 30+ Banks as US Stalls on Liability

Europe has moved agentic payments into live production while the United States remains stalled over who bears the loss when an AI agent errs. Live end-to-end payments have been executed by Santander, Mastercard, ING, and Worldline, and on July 2, 2026, ING, Worldline, and Visa completed an agentic payment in Germany using Visa Payment Passkeys for biometric authentication. Mastercard has enabled all issuers in Europe at the network level for Agent Pay, backed by a new Lisbon Centre of Excellence for Innovation, with Mastercard Europe President Kelly Devine calling agentic payments a profound shift in how commerce is initiated and executed. In the US, the Treasury OIG has flagged ambiguity in Regulation E on agent authorization, and the AI AGENT Act introduced in July 2026 addresses fiduciary duties rather than liability allocation for agent misexecution, prompting the Consumer Bankers Association to recommend the industry write its own private network rules. Hypertrade data shows a 4,700% year-over-year increase in AI-generated traffic to retail sites, yet agentic commerce is less than 1% of US e-commerce, with only 23% of US consumers trusting generative AI to handle payment transactions and 93% of merchants saying the AI provider should bear the financial loss for incorrect purchases.
Yahoo Finance·9hRead more →
2

Mastercard, Visa race to set standards for AI agent shopping payments

Mastercard rolled out a payment option Thursday that lets cardholders give an AI agent a virtual card to buy things online without checking in before each purchase, with limits on spending, retailers, or required approval before checkout. Rival Visa partnered with Alchemy earlier this year and has announced its own AI shopping and payment product, Visa Intelligent Commerce, which the company says is still being deployed, while Meta's Muse can search for products and navigate checkout but presents the purchase for the user's final approval. Phil Bruno, chief strategy and growth officer at payments company ACI Worldwide, called it "a land grab for infrastructure standards," saying that if card companies set the standards for agentic commerce they can keep the commerce in their environments for decades to come. Consumer appetite lags the infrastructure push: just 7% of U.S. and U.K. consumers surveyed who buy fashion items said they would allow an AI assistant to make purchases without approval under predefined conditions, according to research commissioned by ACI Worldwide, and more than half said they were uncomfortable allowing AI to purchase on their behalf. Mastercard has developed a digital paper trail called Verifiable Intent to record who authorized the agent to shop and what it was authorized to buy, but when asked who would be responsible if an agent made an incorrect, fraudulent, or unauthorized purchase, Mastercard pointed back to Verifiable Intent and did not specify who would ultimately be responsible if an agent bought something outside those instructions.
Fortune·10hRead more →