NPCI to Impose 0.4% Fee on High-Value UPI Payments From 15 October

Regulation Impact 4
โดย Electronic Payments International·IN·Read original
Summary · why it matters

The National Payments Corporation of India will introduce a 0.4% merchant discount rate on Unified Payments Interface transactions exceeding Rs2,000, or $20.8, starting 15 October. The measure follows a legislative amendment passed earlier this week authorising fees on UPI transactions above that threshold, and customers will not pay the MDR directly, with banks advised to ensure merchants do not pass the charge on. The framework sets different fees and caps by merchant category: payments to railways, telecommunications, insurance and fuel merchants carry a flat MDR of Rs5, while general merchant fees on transactions above Rs75,000, or $782, are capped at Rs300, and capital market transactions including equities and mutual funds carry a 0.02% fee capped at Rs300. Small businesses and certain locations remain exempt, with merchants receiving up to Rs100,000 a month through UPI QR-code payments incurring no MDR charges and QR-code transactions in rural and semi-urban areas also remaining free. NPCI said revenue from the levy will support investment in system resilience, technological innovation, cybersecurity and customer service, and the Reserve Bank of India backed the move, saying in a post on X that it is an important step towards strengthening the long-term sustainability of India's digital payments ecosystem. UPI processed 24 billion transactions worth $311bn in August, according to a Reuters report.

Impact on stocks 0

Theme Impact 1

Off-coverage companies 1

National Payments Corporation of IndiaPrivate▲ Positive
Regulationrelevance

NPCI will levy a 0.4% MDR on high-value UPI transactions from 15 October, generating revenue to fund system resilience and innovation.

Related news

2

Partior and LSEG Partner on 24/7 Settlement, Targeting Q1 2027 Launch

Partior, which operates a blockchain-based payment network, announced on the 17th a partnership with LSEG DiSH, the settlement infrastructure arm of London Stock Exchange Group, to bring always-on settlement bank liquidity to international remittance networks. Partior is a blockchain-based interbank clearing and settlement network jointly founded in 2021 by JPMorgan, DBS Bank, and Temasek, with JPMorgan participating as one of its founding shareholders. Under the new framework, the two sides are developing a Multi Settlement Bank solution that combines LSEG DiSH's omnibus trust account with Partior's multi-currency clearing and settlement network, enabling 24/7 liquidity movement among multiple settlement banks. The aim is to reduce the need to pre-fund nostro and vostro accounts and to lessen reliance on remittance cut-off times. Partior, LSEG, and participating banks are currently conducting cross-industry testing and are preparing for a production launch in the first quarter of 2027 and for accepting additional settlement banks into the framework. Founding shareholder Standard Chartered and participating banks such as Deutsche Bank have also expressed their participation in the framework, with an eye toward future feature expansions such as intraday foreign exchange trading and securities settlement.
CoinPost·1hRead more →
impact 4

Europe Runs Live Agent Payments Across 30+ Banks as US Stalls on Liability

Europe has moved agentic payments into live production while the United States remains stalled over who bears the loss when an AI agent errs. Live end-to-end payments have been executed by Santander, Mastercard, ING, and Worldline, and on July 2, 2026, ING, Worldline, and Visa completed an agentic payment in Germany using Visa Payment Passkeys for biometric authentication. Mastercard has enabled all issuers in Europe at the network level for Agent Pay, backed by a new Lisbon Centre of Excellence for Innovation, with Mastercard Europe President Kelly Devine calling agentic payments a profound shift in how commerce is initiated and executed. In the US, the Treasury OIG has flagged ambiguity in Regulation E on agent authorization, and the AI AGENT Act introduced in July 2026 addresses fiduciary duties rather than liability allocation for agent misexecution, prompting the Consumer Bankers Association to recommend the industry write its own private network rules. Hypertrade data shows a 4,700% year-over-year increase in AI-generated traffic to retail sites, yet agentic commerce is less than 1% of US e-commerce, with only 23% of US consumers trusting generative AI to handle payment transactions and 93% of merchants saying the AI provider should bear the financial loss for incorrect purchases.
Yahoo Finance·9hRead more →
2

Mastercard, Visa race to set standards for AI agent shopping payments

Mastercard rolled out a payment option Thursday that lets cardholders give an AI agent a virtual card to buy things online without checking in before each purchase, with limits on spending, retailers, or required approval before checkout. Rival Visa partnered with Alchemy earlier this year and has announced its own AI shopping and payment product, Visa Intelligent Commerce, which the company says is still being deployed, while Meta's Muse can search for products and navigate checkout but presents the purchase for the user's final approval. Phil Bruno, chief strategy and growth officer at payments company ACI Worldwide, called it "a land grab for infrastructure standards," saying that if card companies set the standards for agentic commerce they can keep the commerce in their environments for decades to come. Consumer appetite lags the infrastructure push: just 7% of U.S. and U.K. consumers surveyed who buy fashion items said they would allow an AI assistant to make purchases without approval under predefined conditions, according to research commissioned by ACI Worldwide, and more than half said they were uncomfortable allowing AI to purchase on their behalf. Mastercard has developed a digital paper trail called Verifiable Intent to record who authorized the agent to shop and what it was authorized to buy, but when asked who would be responsible if an agent made an incorrect, fraudulent, or unauthorized purchase, Mastercard pointed back to Verifiable Intent and did not specify who would ultimately be responsible if an agent bought something outside those instructions.
Fortune·10hRead more →