Seattle Times and Newsday Sue OpenAI and Microsoft Over AI Training

Regulation
โดย Investing.com·US·Read original
Summary · why it matters

The Seattle Times and Newsday have filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing the companies of using their journalism without permission to train artificial intelligence systems. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleges that the companies scraped content from the newspapers' websites, including paywalled articles, and incorporated it into datasets for AI products like ChatGPT, Microsoft's Copilot, and Bing's AI features. The newspapers claim these AI systems can reproduce or closely paraphrase their reporting, potentially reducing traffic and subscriptions. Seattle Times President and CEO Alan Fisco emphasized the millions spent annually on journalism, while OpenAI defended its use of publicly available data as fair use, and Microsoft expressed surprise and willingness to discuss solutions. The suit seeks destruction of copyrighted copies and AI models, adding to existing copyright disputes such as The New York Times' 2023 lawsuit against the same companies.

Impact on stocks 1

Artificial Intelligence · 1 stocks
Microsoft Corporation
MSFT
▼ NegativeRegulationrelevance

Microsoft is a defendant in a copyright lawsuit alleging it scraped newspaper content to train Copilot and Bing AI features.

Theme Impact 3

Off-coverage companies 3

NewsdayPrivate▲ Positive
Regulationrelevance

Newsday is a plaintiff suing OpenAI and Microsoft over unauthorized use of its journalism, seeking destruction of infringing models.

OpenAIPrivate▼ Negative
Regulationrelevance

OpenAI is a defendant accused of using newspapers' journalism without permission to train ChatGPT.

The Seattle TimesPrivate▲ Positive
Regulationrelevance

The Seattle Times is a plaintiff suing OpenAI and Microsoft over unauthorized scraping of its paywalled articles.

Related news

2

Google confirms Gemini unintentionally accessed systems at three real companies during security testing

Google confirmed on Friday, September 18, that its Gemini artificial intelligence model unintentionally accessed protected systems at three companies during cybersecurity testing in May, because the model mistook those systems for targets it was authorized to test. Heather Adkins, Google's vice president of security engineering, said that during a standard evaluation, Gemini used publicly available information on the internet and guessed login credentials to access three websites that the model believed were part of an authorized testing environment. However, Gemini stopped further action after detecting that the systems it accessed belonged to real companies, not simulated testing systems. Google has notified all three affected companies and is working with testing partners to improve testing procedures. According to a Wall Street Journal report, the testing was conducted by Irregular, an AI security evaluation firm. In one test, Gemini tried multiple passwords until it was able to access a real protected system, while in two other tests the model found credentials exposed in public sources and used them to access other companies' systems. Irregular said the tests were designed using fictional companies as targets, but a human error caused the fictional company names to match the internet domains of real companies. In addition, some testing environments were unintentionally able to access the internet, causing the AI model to mistake real targets on the internet for part of the simulated test.
InfoQuest·39mRead more →
2

Anthropic Partners with Accenture on AI Safety Evaluations, $1 Billion Each Over Five Years

Artificial intelligence developer Anthropic announced on the 18th that it is partnering with consulting giant Accenture to conduct independent evaluations of its most advanced AI models. Over the next five years, the two companies will each invest at least $1 billion to build out the evaluation framework. Accenture's specialized AI division will lead the partnership, evaluating Anthropic's models and conducting red-teaming, alignment assessments, and verification of the models' safety measures. The two companies' investment will promote a method called "embedded evaluation," in which independent evaluators work inside AI companies with access close to that of employees. Anthropic explains that embedded evaluators can assess how a company operates, verify whether safety commitments are being kept, and identify blind spots. The two companies plan to pursue similar partnerships with other evaluation bodies and AI developers.
ロイター·2hRead more →

Anthropic Weighs New Model Launch Ahead of IPO to Counter OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra

Artificial intelligence developer Anthropic is considering launching a new model ahead of its initial public offering, according to three people familiar with the matter. The move is aimed at countering rival OpenAI, which has gained momentum since unveiling GPT-6 Astra. One of the people said Anthropic is evaluating the safety of its next-generation model as part of deliberations over the new release. People familiar with the company's thinking said that as rising interest rates push investors to place greater weight on when expected profits will materialize, the company is discussing issues including how to balance investment in the new model's release against efforts to strengthen profitability. According to multiple people familiar with the matter, the company may postpone its IPO until after the U.S. midterm elections in November. Anthropic declined to comment.
ロイター·2hRead more →