Thai SEC seeks public comment on stricter five-point stablecoin regulation to curb money laundering

RegulationDigital Finance
โดย Money & Banking·TH·Read original
Summary · why it matters

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has opened a public consultation on principles for regulating stablecoin transactions through digital asset businesses, aiming to prevent risks from money laundering, technology crime, and circumvention of cross-border transfer rules. The SEC board approved the principles at its meeting in September 2026. The proposed rules under consultation are divided into five main parts. The first governs stablecoin transfers through digital asset businesses, requiring that transfers be made only to the customer's own account or wallet, that they comply with the Travel Rule, and that inbound and outbound transfers be capped at no more than 5 million baht per day per person per business operator, with exceptions for transfers between customer accounts through operators within Thailand and three further exceptions: customers that are digital asset businesses, businesses under the supervision of the Bank of Thailand that are permitted to use stablecoins, and customers acting as liquidity providers in stablecoin/baht pairs. The second part covers off-platform transactions by digital asset brokers and dealers, setting a minimum transaction value of 3 million baht and above, requiring disclosure of trading prices on their website or platform, and prohibiting brokers from arranging direct customer-to-customer transactions. The third part tightens oversight of liquidity providers and liquidity service providers, requiring digital asset exchanges to disclose on their websites the list of market makers and the digital assets for which they provide liquidity, while brokers are prohibited from having liquidity providers for stablecoin/baht pair transactions, and liquidity providers must not be located in countries without FATF measures. The fourth part brings source exchanges under the supervision of anti-money-laundering or business-conduct regulators. The fifth part strengthens the SEC's power to order business operators to correct or carry out data collection and disclosure within a specified period.

Impact on stocks 0

Theme Impact 4

Related news

2impact 4

S&P Global Acquires OpenZeppelin to Rate Smart Contract Risk

S&P Global announced on September 17, 2026 that it has acquired OpenZeppelin, the industry standard for smart contract security, in a move that extends the ratings firm's risk-assessment mandate into the technology-risk layer of digital assets. OpenZeppelin's libraries underpin over $37 trillion in cumulative transfers and power 8 of the top 10 stablecoins, including USDC, and 10 of the top 10 tokenized money market funds, such as BlackRock's BUIDL and Franklin Templeton's BENJI. OpenZeppelin will operate as a separate business unit led by CEO Demian Brener, who will report directly to Yann Le Pallec, President of S&P Global Ratings. The deal lands on the same day the SEC granted a 5-year exemption for tokenized NMS stock trading, aligning with the broader GENIUS Act framework, and ahead of the DTCC Tokenization Service launch in October 2026. S&P Global is positioning itself as the gatekeeper of the technical standards regulators are expected to require for tokenized markets.
Yahoo Finance·4hRead more →
impact 4

Europe Runs Live Agent Payments Across 30+ Banks as US Stalls on Liability

Europe has moved agentic payments into live production while the United States remains stalled over who bears the loss when an AI agent errs. Live end-to-end payments have been executed by Santander, Mastercard, ING, and Worldline, and on July 2, 2026, ING, Worldline, and Visa completed an agentic payment in Germany using Visa Payment Passkeys for biometric authentication. Mastercard has enabled all issuers in Europe at the network level for Agent Pay, backed by a new Lisbon Centre of Excellence for Innovation, with Mastercard Europe President Kelly Devine calling agentic payments a profound shift in how commerce is initiated and executed. In the US, the Treasury OIG has flagged ambiguity in Regulation E on agent authorization, and the AI AGENT Act introduced in July 2026 addresses fiduciary duties rather than liability allocation for agent misexecution, prompting the Consumer Bankers Association to recommend the industry write its own private network rules. Hypertrade data shows a 4,700% year-over-year increase in AI-generated traffic to retail sites, yet agentic commerce is less than 1% of US e-commerce, with only 23% of US consumers trusting generative AI to handle payment transactions and 93% of merchants saying the AI provider should bear the financial loss for incorrect purchases.
Yahoo Finance·9hRead more →
2

Mastercard, Visa race to set standards for AI agent shopping payments

Mastercard rolled out a payment option Thursday that lets cardholders give an AI agent a virtual card to buy things online without checking in before each purchase, with limits on spending, retailers, or required approval before checkout. Rival Visa partnered with Alchemy earlier this year and has announced its own AI shopping and payment product, Visa Intelligent Commerce, which the company says is still being deployed, while Meta's Muse can search for products and navigate checkout but presents the purchase for the user's final approval. Phil Bruno, chief strategy and growth officer at payments company ACI Worldwide, called it "a land grab for infrastructure standards," saying that if card companies set the standards for agentic commerce they can keep the commerce in their environments for decades to come. Consumer appetite lags the infrastructure push: just 7% of U.S. and U.K. consumers surveyed who buy fashion items said they would allow an AI assistant to make purchases without approval under predefined conditions, according to research commissioned by ACI Worldwide, and more than half said they were uncomfortable allowing AI to purchase on their behalf. Mastercard has developed a digital paper trail called Verifiable Intent to record who authorized the agent to shop and what it was authorized to buy, but when asked who would be responsible if an agent made an incorrect, fraudulent, or unauthorized purchase, Mastercard pointed back to Verifiable Intent and did not specify who would ultimately be responsible if an agent bought something outside those instructions.
Fortune·10hRead more →