Veritone Inc

Rosen Law Firm reminds purchasers of Veritone, Inc. securities between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026 of the July 20, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline in a securities class action. If you purchased Veritone securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The lawsuit alleges that Veritone made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose that it inaccurately recorded and misclassified certain revenue and costs, overstated its revenue and other financial metrics, and maintained deficient internal controls, leading to a restatement of financial statements and investor damages when the truth emerged.

Rosen Law Firm reminds purchasers of Veritone securities between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026 of the July 20, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline in a securities class action. The lawsuit alleges that Veritone made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose that it inaccurately recorded or misclassified certain revenue and costs, overstated its revenue, assets, accounts receivable, royalties and other comprehensive income, and maintained deficient internal controls, which forced a restatement of financial statements and caused investor losses. Investors may be entitled to compensation through a contingency fee arrangement and can join the action by contacting the firm. Rosen Law Firm highlights its track record in securities class actions, including the largest-ever settlement against a Chinese company and over $438 million recovered for investors in 2019.

A securities class action has been filed against Veritone after the company admitted its previously issued financial statements were materially misstated. The suit, covering the period from October 14, 2025 to April 14, 2026, alleges that Veritone and its executives intentionally misled investors by inaccurately recording revenue and costs, overstating revenue and assets, and maintaining deficient internal controls. Key disclosures in early 2026 included a March 26 announcement that it was finalizing accounting determinations for certain revenue transactions, which caused shares to fall over 29% the following day, and an April 14 formal disclosure that its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 should no longer be relied upon. National shareholder rights firm Hagens Berman is investigating the claims, and investors who suffered losses have until July 20, 2026 to move for appointment as lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC has filed a class action lawsuit against Veritone, Inc. and certain officers, alleging violations of federal securities laws. The suit covers investors who purchased or acquired Veritone securities between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026. The complaint claims the company made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose that it inaccurately recorded or misclassified revenue and costs, overstated revenue, assets, accounts receivable, royalties and other comprehensive income, and maintained deficient internal controls over accounting and financial reporting, leading to a restatement of certain financial statements. Investors have until July 20, 2026 to seek lead plaintiff appointment. The law firm represents investors on a contingency fee basis.

The Portnoy Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of Veritone, Inc. investors who purchased securities between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026. The lawsuit follows a series of disclosures that caused Veritone's stock price to decline significantly. On March 26, 2026, the company announced preliminary fourth quarter 2025 revenue of $18.1 million to $30.0 million and stated it was finalizing accounting for certain revenue transactions, leading to a 29.5% drop in share price. On April 1, 2026, Veritone filed a Form NT 10-K disclosing delays due to accounting analysis of barter revenue transactions, which could result in a reduction of previously reported revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 by $1.5 million to $2.5 million, causing a further 9.14% decline. On April 14, 2026, the company filed a Form 8-K stating that its previously issued unaudited financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 should no longer be relied upon due to errors including overstatement of revenue and understatement of net loss, resulting in an additional 8.3% drop. Investors have until July 20, 2026 to file a lead plaintiff motion.

The Law Offices of Howard G. Smith reminds investors that class action lawsuits have been filed on behalf of shareholders of Phreesia, Sportradar Group, Commvault Systems, and Veritone, with lead plaintiff deadlines between July 13 and July 20, 2026. The Phreesia complaint alleges the company misled investors about its long-term growth outlook and revenue projections for fiscal year 2027, while the Sportradar suit claims the company worked with black-market gambling operators despite assurances of compliance. Commvault is accused of failing to disclose the impact of different sale types on annual recurring revenue growth, and Veritone allegedly overstated revenue and assets due to misclassified revenue and costs, leading to a restatement. Investors who suffered losses may contact the law firm to discuss their legal rights.

The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz reminds investors that class action lawsuits have been filed on behalf of shareholders of Phreesia, Sportradar Group, Commvault Systems, and Veritone. For Phreesia, the class period is May 8, 2025 through March 30, 2026, with a lead plaintiff deadline of July 13, 2026; the complaint alleges the company created a false impression about its long-term growth outlook and revenue projections. Sportradar's class period runs from November 7, 2024 to April 21, 2026, with a July 17, 2026 deadline, and the suit claims the company worked with black-market gambling operators despite assurances of compliance. Commvault Systems faces a class period of April 29, 2025 to January 26, 2026, also with a July 17, 2026 deadline, over allegations it failed to disclose the impact of different sales types on annual recurring revenue growth. Veritone's class period is October 14, 2025 through April 14, 2026, with a July 20, 2026 deadline, and the complaint alleges the company misclassified revenue and costs, overstated financials, and maintained deficient internal controls.

Veritone shareholders approved all six proposals at the 2026 annual meeting, including an increase in authorized common shares from 150 million to 225 million and the addition of 3 million shares to the equity incentive plan. CEO Ryan Steelberg addressed dilution concerns, stating the company needs the capacity for hiring and possible capital raises while working toward profitability. Shareholders also re-elected two directors, appointed CBIZ as auditor, approved executive compensation, and granted restricted stock unit awards to Steelberg. Steelberg noted the company is focused on handling upcoming debt obligations and defending against pending litigation, which he called baseless.

A securities class action has been filed against Veritone after the company admitted its previously issued financial statements were materially misstated. The lawsuit alleges that Veritone and its executives intentionally misled investors by inaccurately recording and misclassifying revenue and costs, overstating revenue, assets, and other financial metrics, and maintaining deficient internal controls during the period from October 14, 2025, to April 14, 2026. Key disclosures included a March 26, 2026 announcement that it was finalizing accounting determinations for certain revenue transactions, which caused shares to fall over 29% the next day, followed by a delay in its annual report filing on April 1, 2026, and a formal disclosure on April 14, 2026, that its unaudited financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, should no longer be relied upon. The court-imposed deadline for investors to move for appointment as lead plaintiff is July 20, 2026.

Moore Law PLLC is investigating potential claims against officers and directors of Veritone, Inc. The investigation concerns allegations that the company made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose that it inaccurately recorded or misclassified certain revenue and costs, overstated revenue, assets, accounts receivable, royalties and other comprehensive income, maintained deficient internal controls, and would be forced to restate financial statements. On March 26, 2026, Veritone released preliminary fourth quarter 2025 financial results expecting revenue between $18.1 and $30 million, citing ongoing accounting determinations, and its stock fell 29.5% to $1.84 per share the next day. On April 14, 2026, the company disclosed that its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 should no longer be relied upon due to errors that significantly overstated revenue and understated net loss. Shareholders may be able to seek monetary damages and other remedies on a contingency fee basis with no out-of-pocket costs.

Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP reminds Veritone investors of a July 20, 2026 deadline to move for lead plaintiff in a class action covering purchases between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026. The suit alleges the company made false statements and failed to disclose that it inaccurately recorded or misclassified revenue and costs, overstated revenue and other financial items, and maintained deficient internal controls, leading to a restatement. A series of disclosures beginning March 26, 2026, including a preliminary fourth-quarter revenue range of $18.1 million to $30.0 million, a delayed 10-K filing citing barter revenue accounting issues, and an April 14, 2026 8-K stating prior financials should no longer be relied upon, caused Veritone’s stock to drop 29.5%, 9.14%, and 8.3% on respective trading days.

Rosen Law Firm reminds purchasers of Veritone securities between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026 of the July 20, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline in a securities class action. The lawsuit alleges that Veritone made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose that it inaccurately recorded or misclassified certain revenue and costs, overstated its revenue, assets, accounts receivable, royalties and other comprehensive income, and maintained deficient internal controls, which forced a restatement of financial statements. Investors who purchased Veritone securities during the class period may be entitled to compensation through a contingency fee arrangement. A lead plaintiff must move the Court no later than July 20, 2026.

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. has filed a class action lawsuit against Veritone, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of investors who purchased or acquired Veritone securities between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026. The lawsuit alleges that Veritone made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose that it inaccurately recorded or misclassified certain revenue and costs, overstated its revenue, assets, accounts receivable, royalties and other comprehensive income, and maintained deficient internal controls over accounting and financial reporting, which forced a restatement of certain financial statements. Investors have until July 20, 2026 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff. Those who suffered losses can contact the firm at investigations@bespc.com or (212) 355-4648.

Bernstein Liebhard LLP announced that a shareholder has filed a securities class action lawsuit against Veritone, Inc. on behalf of investors who purchased or acquired Veritone securities between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026. The lawsuit alleges that defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding certain revenue and cost business operation metrics, causing Veritone securities to trade at artificially inflated prices during the class period. Investors who wish to serve as lead plaintiff must file papers by July 20, 2026. Bernstein Liebhard has recovered over $3.5 billion for clients since 1993.

The Schall Law Firm reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Veritone, Inc. for alleged securities fraud. The lawsuit covers investors who purchased Veritone securities between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026, with a lead plaintiff deadline of July 20, 2026. The complaint alleges Veritone made false and misleading statements by misclassifying certain revenues and costs, leading to overstated revenues, accounts receivable, and other income, and that the company failed to maintain appropriate accounting controls. When the market learned the truth, investors suffered damages.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP reminds investors who purchased or acquired Veritone securities between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026 of the July 20, 2026 deadline to seek lead plaintiff status in a federal securities class action against the company. The complaint alleges Veritone and its executives made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose that the company inaccurately recorded or misclassified certain revenue and costs, overstated revenue, assets, accounts receivable, royalties and other comprehensive income, maintained deficient internal controls, and would need to restate financial statements. Investors who suffered losses may contact Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 to discuss their legal rights.

Rosen Law Firm reminds purchasers of Veritone, Inc. securities between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026 of the July 20, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline in a securities class action. Investors who bought Veritone securities during the class period may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out-of-pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The lawsuit alleges that Veritone made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose that it inaccurately recorded and classified certain revenues and costs, overstating its revenue, assets, accounts receivable, royalties, and other comprehensive income, and that its internal controls over accounting and financial reporting were deficient, forcing a restatement of certain financial statements. Rosen Law Firm highlights its track record in securities class actions, including the largest-ever settlement against a Chinese company, and encourages investors to contact the firm or visit its website to join the case before the deadline.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC has filed a class action lawsuit against Veritone, Inc. and certain officers, alleging violations of federal securities laws. The suit covers investors who purchased or acquired Veritone securities between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026. The complaint claims the company made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose that it inaccurately recorded or misclassified revenue and costs, overstated revenue, assets, accounts receivable, royalties and other comprehensive income, and maintained deficient internal controls over accounting and financial reporting. As a result, Veritone would need to restate certain financial statements, and positive statements about its business were materially misleading. Investors have until July 20, 2026 to seek lead plaintiff appointment.

Pomerantz LLP has filed a class action lawsuit against Veritone, Inc. over potential securities fraud, and investors have until July 20, 2026 to seek lead plaintiff appointment. The suit follows a series of disclosures beginning on March 26, 2026, when Veritone announced preliminary fourth-quarter 2025 revenue of $18.1 million to $30.0 million and said it was finalizing accounting for certain revenue transactions under ASC 606, causing its stock to drop 29.5% to $1.84 per share. On April 1, 2026, the company filed a Form NT 10-K revealing delays in its annual report due to accounting analysis of barter revenue transactions that could reduce previously reported revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 by $1.5 million to $2.5 million, and shares fell another 9.14% to $1.79. Then on April 14, 2026, Veritone filed a Form 8-K stating that its unaudited financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 should no longer be relied upon because of errors that significantly overstated revenue and understated net loss, sending the stock down 8.3% to $2.09 per share.

The Law Offices of Howard G. Smith reminds investors of upcoming lead plaintiff deadlines in securities fraud class actions against Phreesia, Sportradar, Commvault, and Veritone. Phreesia faces a July 13, 2026 deadline over allegations it misled investors about its pharmaceutical marketing commitments as a durable growth driver for its Network Solutions segment, putting fiscal 2027 revenue targets at risk. Sportradar has a July 17, 2026 deadline amid claims it worked with black-market gambling operators and overstated its compliance processes. Commvault also has a July 17, 2026 deadline, with allegations it failed to disclose how different sale types impact annual recurring revenue growth. Veritone's deadline is July 20, 2026, over accusations of misclassified revenue, overstated assets, and deficient internal controls that led to financial restatements.

SueWallSt has issued an alert for Veritone, Inc. investors regarding a pending securities class action, with a court-set lead plaintiff deadline of July 20, 2026. The lawsuit covers investors who purchased Veritone shares between October 14, 2025 and April 14, 2026, after the company's stock fell approximately 29.5% when it disclosed it could not finalize basic accounting determinations. The complaint alleges that Veritone's internal controls over financial reporting were deficient, with material weaknesses dating back to fiscal years 2022 and 2023 that persisted through September 30, 2025, and that management assured investors these weaknesses had not caused material misstatements. Veritone later declared its Q3 2025 financial statements unreliable, revealing errors affecting revenue, assets, accounts receivable, and accumulated other comprehensive income, including overstatements across multiple line items. The firm notes that investors who purchased during the class period and suffered losses may be eligible to participate, with no upfront costs as the case is handled on a contingency basis.