Crispr Therapeutics AGArticle concludes CRISPR is a more investible choice than Viking due to its approved treatment and modest sales, despite revenue decline and losses.
CRISPR Therapeutics and Viking Therapeutics present contrasting investment profiles in the biotech sector. CRISPR reported fiscal 2025 revenue of approximately $3.5 million, a nearly 90% decline from the prior year, and a net loss of roughly $581.6 million, while Viking had no revenue and a net loss of approximately $359.6 million. CRISPR's current ratio stands at about 13.3 with a debt-to-equity ratio of roughly 0.2, whereas Viking's current ratio is close to 9.3 with essentially zero debt. On a forward earnings basis, Viking appears slightly more favorable with a forward P/E of 17.7 compared to CRISPR's 19.1, though both carry significant premiums. The analysis concludes that CRISPR, with its approved gene-editing treatment and modest sales, is a more investible choice than the pre-revenue Viking, despite both being highly speculative.
Crispr Therapeutics AGArticle concludes CRISPR is a more investible choice than Viking due to its approved treatment and modest sales, despite revenue decline and losses.
Viking Therapeutics IncArticle concludes Viking is less investible than CRISPR due to being pre-revenue with no approved products, despite lower forward P/E.
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc