MicroStrategy IncorporatedSaylor's opposition to BIP-110 soft fork could affect Bitcoin's protocol governance, but impact on Strategy is unclear as it may signal his influence or precede a Bitcoin purchase/sale.

Michael Saylor, co-founder and executive chairman of Strategy, published a 110-point essay on X urging the Bitcoin network to reject the BIP-110 soft fork proposal, a temporary one-year anti-spam measure. The essay, titled '110 Reasons BIP 110 Is a Bad Idea,' had garnered over 840,000 views by Sunday afternoon. Saylor argued that consensus rules should not judge the purpose of valid, fee-paying transactions, calling the proposal a 'Bitcoin-borne pathogen.' BIP-110 was first released as BIP-444 in October 2025 after Bitcoin Core v30 removed default OP_RETURN data limits, with Ocean CTO Luke Dashjr among its main proponents. Under the deployment timeline, the mandatory signaling period would begin near block 961,632 around August 7, with only 0.86% of blocks in the current difficulty adjustment period signaling support, far from the 55% threshold needed for lock-in. Supporters argue the measure is necessary to preserve Bitcoin's financial utility, and pro-BIP-110 investor Fred Krueger responded with 110 counterarguments in favor. This intervention marks Saylor's first step into protocol governance engagement. Strategy is the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, with 843,775 BTC at an average cost of 75,476 dollars. Saylor later posted a chart from StrategyTracker.com showing holdings valued at 54.28 billion dollars, along with the question 'What happens next?'—often a signal before purchase disclosures, though its reliability has waned after it preceded the company's largest-ever Bitcoin sale.
MicroStrategy IncorporatedSaylor's opposition to BIP-110 soft fork could affect Bitcoin's protocol governance, but impact on Strategy is unclear as it may signal his influence or precede a Bitcoin purchase/sale.
BIP-110, supported by Ocean CTO Luke Dashjr, faces low signaling support and Saylor's opposition.