Charles Schwab CorpCharles Schwab proposed a public filing period of at least 75 days for novel ETPs in its SEC comment.

Crypto firms, asset managers, market makers, and consumer advocates submitted competing proposals to the SEC for regulating novel exchange-traded products, including crypto, private assets, event contracts, and leveraged strategies. The Crypto Council for Innovation urged the SEC to extend regulatory efficiencies available to ETFs under the Investment Company Act of 1940 to other ETPs, while Andreessen Horowitz advised against treating all novel ETFs as a single category and called for closer coordination between fund-registration and exchange-listing reviews. Grayscale opposed new portfolio restrictions for digital-asset products, Charles Schwab proposed a public filing period of at least 75 days, and Chainalysis recommended real-time surveillance on public blockchains. Prediction market Kalshi argued that event contracts should remain eligible for registered funds, but consumer group Public Citizen warned that such ETFs would place gambling-like products in a vehicle retail investors trust for long-term investing. The SEC must now decide whether these products need a common framework or separate rules based on their structures and risks.
Charles Schwab CorpCharles Schwab proposed a public filing period of at least 75 days for novel ETPs in its SEC comment.
Andreessen Horowitz advised the SEC against treating all novel ETFs as one category and urged coordination between fund-registration and exchange-listing reviews.
Chainalysis recommended real-time surveillance on public blockchains in its SEC proposal.
Grayscale opposed new portfolio restrictions for digital-asset products in the SEC rulemaking.
Kalshi argued event contracts should remain eligible for registered funds, drawing pushback from consumer advocates.